REPORT OF THE AD HOC COMMITTEE TO SUGGEST BROAD GUIDELINES FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF MANAGEMENT OF URINARY INCONTINENCE
CHAIRPERSON
Alan J. Wein, MD
COMMITTEE MEMBERS
Jerry Blaivas. MD
Roger Dmochowski, MD
Edward McGuire, MD
Peggy Norton, MD
Nancy Reilly, MSN, RN, CURN, CRNP
[Note: While every effort has been made to ensure accuracy, this is NOT an official copy of the document, and may contain typographical errors outside the scope of Microsoft products, was well as British-American spelling discrepancies. Readers needing an official copy should contact the AUA directly at aua@auanet.org]
[End of cover page]
REPORT OF THE AD HOC COMMITTEE TO SUGGEST
BROAD GUIDELINES FOR THE MANAGEMENT
OF URINARY INCONTINENCE
I. INTRODUCTION
This ad hoc committee was convened by the American Urological Association consequent to a dialogue with the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) relating to the management of urinary incontinence. The facts and opinions expressed here represent a broad consensus of this multidisciplinary committee and follow the format of the recently completed 1st International Consultation on Incontinence, in which recommendations were made by focused subcommittees which based their composite opinion on a review of the available literature and global subjective opinion.
The document is not meant to be an all-inclusive treatise on the subject of urinary incontinence. Rather, the committee members intend it to be a brief review of the following subjects: definition and subtypes (classification) of urinary incontinence; scope and impact of urinary incontinence; pathophysiology (broadly) of the various types of urinary incontinence; and, broad guidelines for appropriate management (the term 'management" referring to evaluation and treatment). It was felt that the algorithms produced by the various subcommittees of the 1st International Consultation on Incontinence provided a broad consensus for appropriate management with some exceptions which are specifically noted. A limited number of source documents are cited as references.
II. DEFINITION AND CLASSIFICATION OF URINARY INCONTINENCE
Urinary incontinence is defined as the involuntary loss of urine. The term is used in various ways. It may denote a symptom, a sign, or a condition. The symptom is generally thought of as the patient's complaint of involuntary urine loss. The sign is the objective demonstration of urine loss. The condition is the underlying cause (pathophysiology). A simple classification of the various subtypes of urinary incontinence is seen in attachment 1. Most practitioners use definitions that conform, either exactly or approximately, to those formulated by the International Continence Society for lower urinary tract dysfunction. Attachments 2 and 3 define terms relevant to the description of urinary incontinence. These categorizations are further explained under the subheading, pathophysiology.
[Page 1]
One additional fact with respect to definition, however, bears mention. The traditional perspective on urinary incontinence fails to account for instances in which symptoms of urinary frequency and urgency are present without the involuntary loss of urine. "Overactive bladder is a new term which is being applied to the symptoms of frequency, urgency, urge or reflex incontinence, alone or in any combination, when existing in the absence of local pathologic factors (urinary tract infection, bladder stone, bladder cancer, interstitial cystitis, etc.) explaining these symptoms. In the opinion of this committee, the management (evaluation and treatment) of these lower urinary tract symptoms should be the same as that of urgency incontinence or reflex incontinence.
III. SCOPE AND IMPACT OF URINARY INCONTINENCE
In 1996, the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research reported urinary incontinence as affecting 13 million Americans in community and institutional settings, with an annual cost, estimated in 1994 dollars, of 16.4 billion dollars. Reported prevalence rates of urinary incontinence vary considerably, depending on definition (how frequently, how much, how bothersome), how the information is obtained, and on the population studied. Reasonable estimates of the prevalence of urinary incontinence in the population between 15 and 64 years of age range from 1.5 to 5% in men and from 10% to 30% in women. For non-institutionalized persons older than 60 years of age prevalence estimates range from 15% to 35%, with women having twice the prevalence of men. Among the more than 1.5 million nursing facility residents, the prevalence of urinary incontinence is estimated at 50% or greater. Other data regarding incidence and prevalence are readily available from reference texts (see bibliography). Besides the strictly financial costs, urinary incontinence imposes a significant psychosocial impact on individuals, their families, and caregivers. Quality of life, as measured by both generic and lower urinary tract specific indices, is adversely affected to a significant degree. The primary spheres affected are (1) self esteem; (2) ability to maintain an independent lifestyle; (3) social interactions with friends and family; (4) activities of daily life; (5) sexual activity.
IV. PATHOPHYSIOLOGY
The lower urinary tract functions as a group of interrelated structures whose joint function in the adult is to bring about efficient and low pressure bladder filling, low pressure urine storage with perfect continence, and periodic voluntary urine expulsion, again at low pressure. The anatomic, morphologic, physiologic, pharmacologic, and mechanical factors involved in both the storage and expulsion of urine by the lower urinary tract have been detailed
[Page 2]
by numerous authors in numerous texts. Our discussion here excludes so-called extraurethral incontinence (see attachment 1), which is due either to a fistula (an abnormal communication between the bladder and the vagina, ureter and vagina, or urethra and vagina), and those individuals with an ectopic ureter (a ureter which drains into an abnormal site with no sphincteric mechanism between it and the exterior environment). Excluding individuals with so-called functional incontinence (individuals who do not recognize a need to urinate in a socially acceptable manner or place, because of neural immaturity, cerebral disease or dementia and those who cannot access an acceptable place to urinate because of physical disability), the pathophysiology of urinary incontinence involves the bladder, the bladder outlet (the bladder neck and urethra), or both. One can summarize the requirements for normal bladder filling and urine storage very simply as
1. Accommodation of increasing volumes at a low intravesical pressure and with appropriate sensation
2. A bladder outlet that is closed and competent at rest and remains so during increases in intra-abdominal pressure
3. The absence of involuntary bladder contractions.
Any type of voiding dysfunction having to do with the filling/storage phase of micturition, including urinary incontinence, must result from an abnormality of one or more of the factors listed above. Overactivity of the bladder during filling/storage can be expressed as phasic involuntary contractions, as low compliance (a tonic increase in the pressure/volume curve), or as a combination of the two. Involuntary bladder contractions are most commonly seen in association with neurologic disease or after neurologic injury. However, they may be also associated with inflammation or irritation of the bladder wall, bladder outlet obstruction, aging, or they may be idiopathic. Decreased compliance during filling may be secondary to a neurologic injury or disease (usually at the level of the sacral spinal cord or below), but may result also from any process that destroys the viscoelastic or elastic properties of the bladder wall. Storage failure may occur also in the absence of hyperactivity, but secondary to hypersensitivity or pain during filling. In this instance, the incontinence results from an uncontrollable need to get rid of the painful bladder sensation, a circumstance which may be seen with irritation, inflammation, neurologic, or psychological causes. Incontinence due to decreased outlet resistance (so-called sphincteric related, as opposed to bladder related incontinence) may result from any process that damages the innervation or the structural
[Page 3]
elements of the smooth or striated sphincter or their supports. This may occur with neurologic disease or injury, surgical or other mechanical trauma, or aging. Urethral instability refers to the rare phenomenon of episodic decreases in outlet pressure unrelated to increases in bladder or abdominal pressure. The term urethral instability is probably a misnomer, because many feel that the drop in urethral pressure represents simply the urethral component of a normal voiding reflex in an individual whose bladder does not measurably contract, either because of myogenic or neurogenic reasons. There are situations where urethral incontinence cannot be considered merely as an isolated abnormality of either bladder contractility or sphincteric resistance. These situations, listed in attachment 4, are more complicated to deal with, because they are more difficult to diagnose and because one entity may adversely affect or compromise treatment of the other. A brief description of the more common types of urinary incontinence follows:
Outlet Related Incontinence in the Female: In women there are two clinical types of sphincteric incontinence, that related to urethral hypermobility (so-called 'genuine" stress incontinence) and to intrinsic sphincter deficiency (ISD). With urethral hypermobility there is weakness of the pelvic floor. During increases in intra-abdominal pressure there is descent of the bladder neck and proximal urethra. If the urethra opens concomitantly, stress urinary incontinence ensues. In the classic form of urethral hypermobility, there is rotational descent of the bladder neck and urethra. However, the urethra may also descend without rotation (it shortens and widens) or the posterior wall of the urethra may be pulled open while the anterior wall remains fixed. It should be noted, however, that urethral hypermobility is often present in women who are not incontinent, and thus the mere presence of urethral hypermobility is not sufficient to make a diagnosis of a sphincter abnormality unless urinary incontinence is also demonstrated. The "hammock hypothesis" proposes that, for stress incontinence to occur with hypermobility, there must be a lack of stability of the suburethral supportive layer. This theory proposes that the effect of abdominal pressure increases on the normal bladder outlet, if the suburethral supportive layer is firm, is to compress the urethra rapidly and effectively. If the supportive suburethral layer is lax and/or movable, compression is not as effective. ISD denotes an intrinsic malfunction of the urethral sphincter mechanism itself. In its most overt form, it is characterized by a bladder neck which is open at rest, a low Valsalva leak point pressure and urethral closure pressure
[Page 4]
(specialized urodynamic studies -- see section on management) and is usually the result of prior surgery, trauma with scarring, or a neurologic lesion. As the physiology and pathophysiology of the bladder outlet is better studied, many individuals are beginning to feel that some element of intrinsic sphincter deficiency is present in every case of sphincteric incontinence, including "genuine" stress urinary incontinence. The two extremes, however, are clearly separate and readily recognizable.
Outlet Related Incontinence in the Male: In theory at least, categories of outlet related incontinence in the male are similar to those in the female. In reality, there is little if any information regarding the topic of urethral instability in the male. Sphincteric incontinence is due generally to neurologic impairment or anatomic disruption after prostatic surgery or urethral trauma. Sphincteric incontinence in the male is not associated with hypermobility of the bladder neck and proximal urethra, but is rather more similar to what is termed ISD in the female.
Bladder Related Incontinence in the Female; Bladder related abnormalities causing urinary incontinence consist of either detrusor overactivity or low bladder compliance. Detrusor overactivity is a generic term for involuntary bladder contractions. These can be either due to neurologic conditions (in which case detrusor hyperreflexia is the term applied) or non-neurologic in origin (in which case the term detrusor instability is employed). Neurologically, involuntary bladder contractions can be due to any lesion occurring above the sacral spinal cord. The cause(s) of detrusor instability in the female is (are) obscure. In addition to the prior etiologies, one subject that should be mentioned is the simultaneous occurrence of bladder instabilty in stress urinary incontinence. The fact that minor components of detrusor instability, and sometimes major ones, often disappear after successful surgery for stress incontinence suggest that these two phenomena may be causally related in an as yet unknown fashion.
Bladder Related Incontinence in the Male; The pathophysiology of bladder related incontinence in the male is similar to that in the female except that there is no known association between detrusor instability and stress incontinence in the male. There is, however, a unique association of detrusor overactivity with bladder outlet obstruction in the male. The incidence of detrusor instability in males with outlet
[Page 5]
obstruction secondary to prostatism ranges from 50 to 80%. When the outlet obstruction is relieved in such patients, there is a high reversion rate of the bladder status to stability (approximately 50%), although this reversion generally takes between one and six months, and may take as long as 12 months.
Overflow Incontinence; This is a descriptive term that denotes leakage of urine associated with urinary retention. This is more common in the male than female. The primary pathophysiology is actually a failure of emptying, leading to urinary retention with "overflow" incontinence, resulting from either continuous or episodic elevation of intravesical pressure over urethral pressure. This generally results in outlet obstruction or detrusor inactivity, either neurologic or pharmacologic in origin, or may be secondary to inadvertent overdistention of the bladder.
V. MANAGEMENT
Management includes the processes of evaluation and treatment. Various algorithms are available for each, ranging from the simplest to the most complicated. What is appropriate for one patient/health care provider combination may not be appropriate for another. The level of complexity of the evaluation and management depends on
A. The clinical problem at hand
B. The prior treatment experience(s)
C. The desire for an exact diagnosis
D. The patient's desire for treatment
E. The patient's goals of therapy
F. The patient's ability and desire to follow instructions or carry out specific tasks
G. The expected level of improvement under optimal circumstances
H. The health care provider's level of expertise Environmental considerations
J. Economic considerations
A complete idealized evaluation menu is seen in attachment 5. Not every test may be necessary or desirable for each patient. For behavioral modification and/or drug therapy in a patient who has previously received no treatment, these may be minimal. For treatment failures, for follow up when silent upper and lower tract deterioration can occur, for a situation where an exact diagnosis is desired, or prior to consideration for surgery or other irreversible therapy, these may be extensive. There are differences of opinion as to the value or non-value
[Page 6]
of various studies under selected circumstances. The committee submits as attachment 6 a modification of pages 947-950 of the test [sic] Incontinence (see references) as a general guideline for the evaluation of incontinence. In addition, Dr. Blaivas has prepared, as attachment 7, a description of the various studies included under the term "urodynamic evaluation".
All known treatments for urinary incontinence are summarized in attachment 8. Inclusion in this list does not imply majority agreement on efficacy. Treatment should generally begin with the simplest most reversible forms of therapy, proceeding gradually up the order of complexity. A patient may elect to bypass a given form of treatment or choose not to remain on a given treatment for a period which the provider recommends. In deciding to proceed up the level of complexity of treatment or to remain at a given level, only the patient (and/or family) is (are) empowered to say when "enough is enough". A perfect result need not be achieved. Satisfaction is the goal, as long as the patient and/or family understands the possible benefits, practicalities, and risks of further therapy.
Although there may be some other differences of opinion as to management strategies in differing conditions, the committee with the exceptions noted above, advocates serious consideration of the recommendations of the International Scientific Committee of the
1St International Consultation on Incontinence (see attachment 9, including algorithms). These recommendations include, for various subtypes of patients (children, men, women, neurogenic urinary incontinence, urinary incontinence in frail-disabled older people), algorithms for initial and specialized management. The committee recommends that when specialized level assessment and procedures are available, they should be performed by specialists. The division into initial and specialized management is somewhat artificial but is intended to outline what the committee feels are the absolute limits of non-specialist treatment in health care systems where initial management may be performed by generalists.[Page 7]
REFERENCES
Abrams P Khoury S, Wein A (eds): Incontinence (1st International Consultation on Incontinence), Plymbridge Distributors, Ltd., Heath Publications Ltd., United Kingdom, 1999.
Blaivas JG, Romanzi U, Heritz OM: Urinary Incontinence: pathophysiology, evaluation, treatment overview, and nonsurgical management. In, Walsh P, Retik A, Vaughan ED, Jr., Wein AJ: Campbell's Urology 7th edition, Saunders, Philadelphia, pp.1007-1043, 1997.
Fantt JA, Newman DK, Coiling J, et al: Urinary Incontinence in Adults: Acute and Chronic Management. Clinical Practice Guideline, No.2, 1996 Update. Rockville. MO; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. AHC PR Publication No. 96-0682. March 1996.
O'Donnell, PD. Urinary Incontinence.. Mosby Year-Book Inc. St. Louis. 1997.
Steers WO. Barrett OM. Wein AJ: \/oiding Dysfunction: diagnosIs. classification, and managemenL In. Glilenwater JY, Grayhack JT. Howards SS. Duckert JW (eds): Adult and Pediatric Urology. Mosby Year-Book. Inc.. St. Louis. 1996. pp. 1220-1326.
Urinary Incontinence Guideline Panel. Urinary Incontinence in Adults: Clinical Practice Guideline. AHCPR Pub. No.92-0038. Rockville. MO: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Public Health Service, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, March 1992.
Wein AJ: Pathophysiology and categorization of voiding dysfunction. In, Walsh P, Retik A, Vaughan ED. Jr., Wein AJ: Campbell's Urology 7th edition, Saunders, Philadelphia. pp.917-926, 1997.
Wein AJ, Barrett, DM: Voiding Function and Dysfunction: A Logical and Practical Approach. Year Book Medical Publishers. Inc., Chicago, 1988.
Attachment 1
CLASSIFICATION OF INCONTINENCE
Extraurethral
A. Fistula (vesicovaginal, ureterovaginal, urethrovaginal)
B. Ectopic ureterII. Urethral
A. Functional
1. Because of physical disability
2. Due to lack of awareness or concernB. Bladder abnormalities
1. Overactivity
a. Involuntary contractions
b. Decreased compliance
2. Sensory urgency with incontinence
C. Outlet abnormalities
1. "Genuine" stress incontinence
2. Intrinsic sphincter deficiency
3. Urethral instability
4. Post-void dribbling
a. Urethral diverticulum
b. Vaginal pooling of urineD. Overflow incontinence
Attachment 2
Blaivas, et al. "Definition and Classification of Urinary Incontinence: Recommendations of the Urodynamic Society". Neurology and Urodynamics 16:149-151; 1997. [This page contains a copyright notice and therefore has not been reproduced.]
Attachment 3
I. Definitions
| The consultation agreed to use the current International
Continence Society definitions (~988) for lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD)including
incontinence. In the text of the book and in some parts of the recommendations possible
changes to definition will be signaled. However it should be emphasized that no changes in
nomenclature can be viewed as official until they have passed through the rigorous ICS
standardization process. The Following ICS definitions are relevant: 1. Overactive Detrusor Function Overactive detrusor function is characterized by involuntary detrusor contractions during the filling phase. which may be spontaneous or provoked (and which the patient cannot completely suppress). . The overactive detrusor is divided into the unstable detrusor and detrusor hyperreflexia. The unstable detrusor is one that is shown objectively to contract. spontaneously or on provocation during the filling phase while the patient is attempting to inhibit mictuntion. Detrusor hyperreflexia is defined as overactivity due to disturbance of the nervous control rnechanisms. Note: There has been a move to change the definitions referable to the overactive detrusor and replace it with "the overactive bladder" (Abrarns and Wein). Sufferers from incontinence more readily understand this term than either the 'overactive detrusor" or the "unstable bladder'. 2. Urinary Incontinence Urinary incontinence is involuntary loss of urine which is objectively demonstrable and a social or hygienic problem. |
Incontinence may be defined according to the patient's symptoms: · Urge incontinence is the involuntary loss of urine associated with a strong desire to void (urgency). · Stress incontinence: the symptom indicates the patient's statement of involuntary loss of urine during physical exertion · "Unconscious" incontinence. Incontinence may occur in the absence of urge and without conscious recognition of the urinary loss. · Enuresis means any involuntary loss of urine. If it is used to denote incontinence during sleep. it should always be qualified with the adjective nocturnal". · Post-micturition dribble and continuous leakage denotes other symptomiatic forms of incontinence. · Genuine stress incontinence is the involuntary loss of urine occurnng when. :'n the absence of a detrusor contraction. the ntravesical pressure exceeds the maximum urethral pressure. · Reflex incontinence is loss of urine due to det:rusor hyperreflexia and/or involuntary urethral relaxation in the absence of the sensation usually associated with the desire to micturate. This condition is only seen in patients with neuropathic bladder/urethral disorders. · Overflow incontinence is any involuntary loss of urine associated with over-distension of the bladder. This term has been criticized and the Consultation's Scientific Committee prefers a term such as 'incontinence associated with poor bladder emptying'. The symptoms and signs of incontinence do not give a definite diagnosis and the cause of incontinence can only be absolutely determined by urody namic studies (UDS). UDS allow the disease processes to be defined. |
Attachment 4
COMBINED PROBLEMS ASSOCIATED WITH INCONTINENCE
Detrusor overactivity with outlet obstruction
Detrusor overactivity with impaired bladder contractility
Sphincteric incontinence with impaired bladder contractility
Sphincteric incontinence with detrusor overactivity
Attachment 5
EVALUATION OF URETHRAL URINARY INCONTINENCE
History and general assessment
Nature and duration
Detailed symptomatic assessment or voiding diary
Prior treatments
Medications
Mental and physical status; fitness for various treatment
Physical examination
To include abdomen, perineum, rectal, neurologic, genitalia, vaginal exams and stress test for suspected stress incontinence
Urinalysis, possible culture and cytology
Renal function assessment
Screening uroflow and post-void residual measurement
Formal urodynamic/videourodynamic testing
Radiologic imaging of the urinary tract
Endoscopy of the lower urinary tract
Pad testing
Quality of life assessment
Neurophysiologic testing
Attachment 6
EVALUATION OF INCONTINENCE
(Modified slightly by the Committee from Abrams et al, 1999, pp.947-950)
The following was utilized to classify diagnostic tests and studies:
· A highly recommended test is a test that should be done on every patient
· A recommended test is a test of proven value in the evaluation of most patients and its use is strongly encouraged during initial evaluation.
· An optional test is a test of proven value in the evaluation of selected patients: its use is left to the clinical judgment of the physician.
· A not recommended test is a test of no proven value in the evaluation of most patients. However, such tests may be helpful in selected patients who do not fulfill the criteria for the standard (usual) patients.
HIGHLY RECOMMENDED TESTS DURING INITIAL EVALUATION
The main
recommendations should be read in conjunction with the management algorithms for children, men, women, neurogenic patients and the frail older person.The initial evaluation should be done on every patient presenting with incontinence to a health care professional.
1. History and General Assessment
Management of a disease such as incontinence requires caregivers to assess the sufferer as a whole individual. Many factors may influence a particular individual's symptoms, some may cause incontinence, and other factors will determine the success of treatment. General assessment has a number of important components:
these may include the social and cultural environment.· Nature and duration of genitourinary tract symptoms.
· Previous surgical procedures in particular as they affect the genitourinary tract).
· Environmental issues:
· Patient mobility:
individuals who have compromised mobility may need to be managed differently.· Mental status: each individual needs to be assessed for their ability to understand
proposed management plans and to enter into discussions when there are a range of treatment options. In some groups of patients formal testing of cognitive function is essential, e.g., those thought to be suffering from dementia.·
Disease status: Coexisting diseases may have a profound effect on incontinence sufferers, for example asthma patients with stress incontinence will suffer greatly during attacks. Diseases may also precipitate incontinence, particularly in frail older persons.· Patient medication:
It is always important to review every patient's medication and to make an assessment as to whether the treatment is in fact causing or worsening the patient's condition.· Sexual function.
At present little information exists on the impact of incontinence: this aspect of the patient's life should be assessed where appropriate.· Bowel function: Although
urinary incontinence is the subject of this consultation, bowel function has considerable influence on urinary problems. In addition, certain groups of urinary incontinent patients may have co-existing fecal incontinence, and/or constipation which may trouble them as much or even more than their urinary leakage.· Patient's fitness for possible surgical procedures.
2. Quantification of Symptoms:
A full urinary history should be taken and can be substituted for a diary. It should include:
a. The
frequency of incontinenceb. The
perceived quantity of urinary leakageC.
The perceived impact of urinary leakage on every day life.The use of a urinary diary (frequency-volume chart), a simple chart, is highly recommended to
document the frequency of micturition, the volumes voided, incontinence episodes and the use of incontinence pads.3.
Physical Examination:There are a number of essential components in the examination of sufferers with incontinence.
examination in an effort to detect a palpable bladder.· Abdominal
· Perineal
examination to assess sensation.· Rectal examination to assess anal tone, the consistency of stool, and in the male, the prostate gland.
· Neurological
examination: concentrating on the S24 segments (the nerve supply of bladder and urethra).· External genitalia.
· Vaginal examination to assess pelvic organ prolapse and estrogen status.
· Stress test for incontinence - patients
with suspected stress incontinence should be asked to cough repeatedly and to bear down.4. Other Diagnostic Tests:
a. Urinalysis:
As urinary infection is a readily detected and easily treatable cause of LUTS, urine testing is highly recommended. Testing may range from examination of urine in a clear glass container, through dipstick testing, to urine microscopy.b. Estimation of Residual Urine:
In neurogenic patients and frail older persons and those with symptoms suggestive of bladder measured outlet obstruction or signs suggestive of an enlarged bladder, it is highly recommended to assess post-void residual urine (PVR) is measured during initial assessment as in these groups of patients the management is dependent on assessment of voiding efficiency. PVR may be assessed by abdominal examination or more accurately by ultrasound estimation. This will simultaneously provide information about bladder capacity and bladder wall changes, and can detect the presence of bladder stones, diverticula and a median lobe. The invasive nature of any other means (i.e. catheterization) to determine residual urine must be weighed against the benefits of the test. Because of the marked intraindividual variability of residual urine volume, the test should be repeated to improve precision, if residual urine volume is significant at the first measurement.
RECOMMENDED DIAGNOSTIC TESTS:
1. Further Symptom Assessment
The use of a number of validated questionnaires is recommended for a more detailed assessment of the symptoms of incontinence and their impact on quality of life. The International Consultation on Incontinence aims to develop a standard questionnaire for the assessment of symptoms and impact on quality of life for use in assessing the effectiveness of treatments for incontinence.
2 Detailed Physical Examination
In female patients, formal assessment is recommended when initial evaluation indicates the possibility of estrogen deficiency, urethral diverticulum, urinary fistula or pelvic organ prolapse. Pelvic organ prolapse should be assessed. Urethral hypermobility should be addressed by
visual inspection or a cotton swab test.3. Renal Function Assessment
Standard chemical tests for renal function are recommended in patients with urinary incontinence and a high probability of renal impairment or prior to surgical interventions.
4. Uroflowmetry and PVR
Uroflowmetry and the measurement of postvoid residual urine (PVR) are recommended as a screening test for voiding dysfunction.
5. Urodynamic Testing
It is recommended that routine urodynamic evaluation should consist of:
a. Filling cystometry (with provocation, and tailored to the individual patient's requirements together with
b. Voiding cystometry
c.
Leak point pressure(s)
The aims of routine urodynamic evaluation are:
· The detection of detrusor overactivity
· The assessment of urethral competence during filing
· The assessment of outlet function during voiding
· The measurement of residual urine
Urodynamic evaluation is recommended:
· When an exact diagnosis is desired
· Prior to invasive treatments
· After treatment failure
· As part of a long-term surveillance program in neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction
· In "complicated incontinence".
Filling and voiding cystometry are most accurately performed as part of multichannel urodynamic studies. For these studies, it is necessary to measure abdominal pressure and calculate detrusor pressure. For any given patient, the greater the degree of sophistication of urodynamic evaluation, the greater the diagnostic accuracy. Thus, cystometry with
synchronous abdominal pressure recording and calculation of detrusor pressure is more accurate than single channel cystometry. Synchronous detrusor pressure/uroflow studies are more accurate than either parameter measured alone and videourodynamic is the most accurate of all. In all multichannel studies, each measured parameter serves as a check against the other and offers not only a higher degree of accuracy, but a means by whichtechnical artifacts can be analyzed and excluded. In this context, there are no absolute indications for individual studies. Rather, the need for each depends on the degree of accuracy demanded by the patient, his physician and the clinical setting.
6. Urinary Tract Imaging
Imaging may be by ultrasound, simple X-ray, or X-ray with contrast.
lower urinary tract is recommended in all patients referred for specialist management and particularly those with suspected lower tract pathology. This is most appropriately performed in conjunction with urodynamic studies.· a. Imaging of the
b. Imaging of the upper urinary tract is recommended only in specific situations. These include:
· Low bladder compliance
· Neurogenic urinary incontinence, e.g., myelodysplasia, spinal cord trauma
· Severe urethral obstruction
· Incontinence associated with significant post-void residual
· Co-existing loin/kidney pain
· Severe untreated pelvic organ prolapse
· Suspected extra-urethral urinary incontinence
· All children with incontinence
7. Endoscopy
· Endoscopy is recommended:
· In men with incontinence
· In the evaluation of suspected vesicovaginal fistula and extra-urethral urinary incontinence
· In patients who have previously undergone bladder, prostate, or other pelvic surgery
· When initial testing suggests other pathologies, e.g., microscopic hematuria raises the possibility of bladder tumor
· When pain, discomfort, persistent urge incontinence, persistent or symptoms of bladder overactivity feature in the patient's symptoms: these may suggest an intravesical lesion
OPTIONAL DIAGNOSTIC TESTS
1. Additional Urodynamic Testing
If a more detailed estimate of urethral function is required then the following urethral function tests are optional:
· Static and stress urethral pressure profilomety
· Video-urodynamics and/or electromyography
If initial urodynamics have failed to demonstrate the causes for the patient's incontinence then the following tests are optional.
· Repeated provocative routine urodynamics
· Ambulatory urodynamics
2. Pad Testing
Pad testing is an optional test for the routine evaluation of incontinence. Either a short test (20 minutes to 1 hour) or a 24 hour test is suggested.
3. Quality of Life Assessment:
A number of existing measures of quality of life have been reviewed by the Symptom and Quality of Life Assessment Committee. A generic or disease specific QOL index may be utilized.
4. Neurophysiological Testing:
The information gained by clinical examination and urodynamic testing may be enhanced by neurophysiological testing of striated muscle and nervous pathways. Appropriately trained personnel should perform these tests. The following neurophysiological tests are optional in patients with incontinence and suspected peripheral lesions.
· Concentric needle EMG
· Sacral reflex responses to electrical stimulation or penis/clitoris
5. Further Urinary Tract Imaging:
CT or MRI imaging of the lower urinary tract and pelvic floor are optional and should have a specific indication.
6. The ICS Classification of pelvic organ prolapse may be used to document the extent of prolapse.
TESTS NOT RECOMMENDED FOR THE INITIAL OR FURTHER EVALUATION OF
INCONTINENCE
· Urinary tract imaging
is not recommended unless there are specific indications (see above)· Endoscopy
of the urinary tract is not recommended unless there are specific indications (see above)· Gas cystometry
is not recommended as part of the urodynamic evaluation of incontinence.
Attachment 7
URODYNAMIC STUDIES
(Jerry Blaivas, MD)
The term urodynamic studies refers to one or more of a series of diagnostic procedures designed to evaluate the lower urinary tract during its storage and emptying phase. Much of urodynamics is an interactive process between patient and physician and, as such, it requires live interpretation of the findings as they occur. During the testing it is usually necessary for the
patient to be queried about what he or she is feeling or trying to do and to be instructed to perform certain maneuvers.Depending upon the degree of sophistication needed, as many as nine components may be evaluated during a single diagnostic session. Simple studies such as uroflow and single channel cystometry may be performed in physician offices without specialized configurations, but sophisticated videourodynamic studies require a dedicated room with fluoroscopy, multichannel electronic urodynamic equipment and a nurse and/or radiology technician in addition to
the physician. The examinations generally last from 30 minutes to 90 minutes, depending upon their complexity.URODYNAMIC TESTS
Cystometry
Cystometry is a test of the storage function of the bladder. It is performed by filling the bladder with fluid while bladder pressure and volume are recorded. The examination is an interactive one -- there is constant communication between the patient and examiner. This is necessary not only to put the patient at ease, but also to be sure that the patient's symptoms are reproduced during the study and that mechanical artifacts are recognized.
Cystometry is necessary to detect involuntary bladder contractions and abnormalities of bladder sensation, capacity, and compliance. When involuntary detrusor contractions are detected, the examiner/patient interaction is crucial to determine the patient's awareness, concern, ability to contract the sphincter, interrupt the urinary stream and abort the detrusor contraction.
Cystometry may be performed either as a single test or as part of multichannel study. As a single test, it may be performed without any electronics using a manometer and estimations of vesical pressure.
Abdominal Pressure Recording
During cystometry, any rise in intra-abdominal pressure will be recorded by the cystometer as a rise in vesical pressure. This simulates a bladder contraction and is the source of many misdiagnoses. Moreover, if a patient strains in an attempt to urinate, the rise in
abdominal pressure may obscure an underlying bladder contraction. For this reason, simultaneous measurement of intra-abdominal pressure (by inserting a rectal catheter) is necessary to recognize and exclude artifacts and a sophisticated examiner must be present to interpret these findings. Measurements of abdominal pressure is, thus, an integral part of multichannel urodynamic studies. As an isolated measurement, it is also useful to estimate the leak point pressure (described below).Thus, abdominal pressure recording may be used as either part of a multichannel
urodynamic study or as a single test for the estimation of leak point pressure.Detrusor Pressure Recording
Detrusor pressure is determined by electronic subtraction of abdominal pressure from
vesical pressure. Detrusor pressure is the driving force behind micturition and its estimation is a necessary component for diagnosing urethral obstruction and impaired detrusor contractility.Because detrusor pressure is calculated electronically, it must always be part of a multichannel study, it can never be done as a single test.
Urofiow
Urinary flow rate assesses the interaction between the bladder and the urethra. The patient voids into an electronic flowmeter which displays the flow curve and a number of other parameters such as mean and maximum flow rate, voided volume, voiding time, etc. Although the uroflow is an excellent screening procedure, a low flow rate cannot distinguish between the two most important pathologic conditions -- bladder outlet obstruction and a weak bladder muscle. The only means of making this important distinction is the pressure/flow analysis.
Uroflow may be performed as an isolated procedure or as part of multichannel urodynamic studies.
Detrusor Pressure/Uro flow
The synchronous measurement of detrusor pressure and uroflow is a basic tool of multichannel urodynamic studies. It is the only means by which a diagnosis of urethral obstruction can be confirmed. It is performed synchronously measuring vesical pressure, abdominal pressure and uroflow. Detrusor pressure is calculated electronically and displayed as a separate channel. The catheter for measuring vesical pressure may be placed transurethrally
obstruction can be confirmed. It is performed synchronously measuring vesical pressure, abdominal pressure and uroflow. Detrusor pressure is calculated electronically and displayed as a separate channel. The catheter for measuring vesical pressure may be placed transurethrally or suprapubically. If the transurethral route is chosen, the patient voids around a small catheter (which measures intravesical pressure) into the flowmeter. If the suprapubic route is chosen, the suprapubic catheter is usually placed percutaneously and flow is measured without the mechanical interference of a catheter in the urethra.
By definition, detrusor pressure/uroflow studies are multichannel studies.
Sphincter Electromyography
There are two methods of sphincter electromyography. In the first method, it is performed by
a competent electromyographer using coaxial needle electrodes in a fashion similar to electromyography performed elsewhere in the body. As such it provides objective diagnostic criteria that enables one to assess the integrity of the innervation to the external urethral sphincter. In addition, the coordination between the bladder and the external urethral sphincter can be accurately assessed.In the second method, surface electrodes are used to identify contractions and relaxations of the striated component of the sphincter and pelvic floor muscles. It is most useful in determining (1) whether a urethral obstruction is due to detrusor-external sphincter dyssynergia or a "non-relaxing" sphincter; (2) whether the patient is able to voluntarily contract the sphincter; and (3) whether the patient is able to voluntarily relax the sphincter.
Except for use in biofeedback for pelvic floor physiotherapy, sphincter electromyography cannot be performed as an isolated test; it must always be done in conjunction with either cystometry or uroflow or part of more sophisticated multichannel urodynamic studies.
Voiding Cystourethrography/Cystogram
Cystography and voiding cystourethrography refer to radiologic visualization of the bladder at rest, and the bladder and urethra during voiding, respectively. In order to perform these test, radiographic contrast is used as the infusant for cystometry and the bladder and urethra are visualized by fluoroscopy both during filling and voiding. These two procedures are necessary to (1) provide the precise localization of the point of urethral obstruction; (2) diagnose vesical and urethral diverticulum; (3) diagnose vesicoureteral reflux; (4) assess the integrity of the urethral sphincter, and (5) determine the degree of vesical and urethral prolapse.
These procedures may be done as isolated examinations or as part of multichannel urodynamic studies.
Fluoroscopy
Fluoroscopy is an essential part of the radiographic examination because it is the only method by which the temporal relationship between physiologic measurements and anatomic function can be appreciated.
Vesical and Abdominal Leak Point Pressure (LPP)
The vesical (VLPP) and abdominal (ALPP) leak point pressures are measures of urethral sphincter function. The VLP and ALPP are the lowest vesical and abdominal pressure, respectively, at which urinary leakage occurs during increases in abdominal pressure (affected by straining or coughing), in the absence of a detrusor contraction.
The VLPP is the most accurate means of assessing sphincteric function because it
actually measures the force that drives urine across the urethra. In some patients, however, urinary leakage is not seen with a urethral catheter in place. In those instances, the urethral catheter can be removed and the rectal catheter left in place. The abdominal pressure at which leakage occurs is recorded as the ALPP.These tests may be done as individual procedures or part of multichannel urodynamic studies.
Detrusor Leak Point Pressure (DLPP)
The DLPP is the lowest detrusor pressure at which urinary leakage occurs during bladder filling. It is a measure of the interaction between the detrusor pressure and urethral resistance and is an important prognostic indicator of risk or the kidneys.
By definition, DLPP cannot be done as an isolated procedure. It is always performed as part of multichannel urodynamic studies.
Urethral Closure Pressure Profile
The urethral closure pressure is a measure pressure for a specified length of urethra in the absence of a detrusor contraction. It may be performed as an isolated procedure or as part of multichannel urodynamic studies.
Micturitional Urethral Pressure Profile
The micturitional urethral pressure profile measures pressure for a specified length of urethra during micturition. It defines the point of urethral obstruction and/or the point of the flow controlling zone.
Stress Urethral Pressure Transmission Ratios
This procedure measures the ratio of pressure transmission from vesical and abdominal pressure to the urethra and is an indirect measure of sphincter strength. It requires simultaneous measurement of urethral and vesical and/or abdominal pressure and, for this reason, cannot be performed as an isolated test.
Videourodynamics
Synchronous measurement and display of urodynamic parameters with radiographic
visualization of the lower urinary tract videourodynamics is the most precise diagnostic tool for evaluating disturbances of micturition. In these studies, radiographic contrast is used as the infusant for cystometry. Depending on the level of sophistication required, other urodynamic parameters such as abdominal, detrusor and urethral pressure, uroflow and sphincter electromyography may be recorded as well. There are important advantages to synchronous video/pressure flow studies compared to conventional single channel urodynamics and to conventional cystography and voiding cystourethrography. By simultaneously measuring multiple urodynamic variables one gains a better insight into the underlying pathophysiology. Moreover, since all variables are visualized simultaneously one can better appreciate their interrelationships and identify artifacts with ease.
Attachment 8
TREATMENT OF URETHRAL URINARY INCONTINENCE IN THE ADULT
Bladder Related Incontinence (Inhibiting bladder contractility, decreasing sensory input and/or
increasing bladder capacity)Behavioral therapy
Fluid restriction
Timed bladder emptying
Pelvic floor exercises +/- biofeedback
Bladder training
Pharmacologic therapy
Anticholinergic agents
Musculotropic relaxants
Calcium antagonists
Potassium channel openers
Prostaglandin inhibitors
Beta-adrenergic agonists
Alpha-adrenergic antagonists
Tricyclic antidepressants
Dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO)
Polysynaptic inhibitors
Therapy decreasing sensory input (capsaicin, resinifenatoxin)Bladder overdistention
Electrical stimulation (reflex inhibition); neuromodulation
Acupuncture
Interruption of innervation
Central (subarachnoid block)
Sacral rhizotomy, selective sacral rhizotomy
Perivesical (peripheral bladder denervation)
Augmentation cystoplasty; autoaugmentation
Sphincter Related Incontinence (Increasing outlet resistance)
Behavioral therapy
Fluid restriction
Timed bladder emptying
Pelvic floor exercises +/- biofeedback
Bladder training
Electrical stimulation
Pharmacologic therapy
Alpha-adrenergic agonists
Tricyclic antidepressants
Beta-adrenergic antagonists, agonists
Estrogens
Occlusive and supportive devices; urethral plugs
Nonsurgical mechanical compression
Periurethral polytef injection
Periurethral collagen injectionVesicourethral suspension (stress urinary incontinence)
Sling procedures
Closure of the bladder outlet
Artificial urinary sphincter
Bladder outlet reconstruction
Prolapse repair (female)
Circumventing the problem
Antidiuretic hormone-like agents
Diuretics
Intermittent catheterization
Continuous catheterization
Urinary diversion
External collecting devices
Absorbent products
Attachment 9 (a&b)
(a) Thuroff, et al. Clinical Guidelines for the Management of Incontinence
[Note: This document is a very poor photocopy of ten pages length that can not be scanned.] Pages 933-943 from 1st International Consultation on Incontinence, 1998.
(b) Abrams, et al. Recommendations of the International Scientific Committee: The Evaluation and Treatment of Urinary Incontinence. 1st International Consultation on Incontinece, 1998.
[Note: the report consists of 20 color Xerox pages of complex flow charts and supporting material. It may be possible to reproduce this by Adobe Acrobat. The section contains very important material.]
Included pages (from the published book) are: 945 and 951-969. Most these pages are full-color flowchart diagrams showing treatment decision.